All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Linus Lüssing" <linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>
To: Brenden Blanco <bblanco@plumgrid.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ipv6_mc_check_mld - kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:1128
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 23:47:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150811214725.GE4402@odroid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150811205140.GD4402@odroid>

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:51:40PM +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:56:12PM -0700, Brenden Blanco wrote:
> > Doing some code reading with Alexei, we found a suspect commit, which
> > introduces an skb_get and skb_may_pull of the same skb, which leads to the BUG
> > when skb->len == len.
> 
> Urgh, didn't know that pskb_may_pull() doesn't like an skb with a
> reference count greater than one... But yes, the BUG() call in
> skbuff.c:1128 / pskb_expand_head() says that (though in this case
> the BUG() in skbuff.c call actually seems kinda weird (/"wrong"?), as
> it isn't shared between different code paths).

The more I think about it, I'm tending to remove the BUG() call in
pskb_expand_head() as in this case it obviously isn't a bug.

The skb_get() allows a simple and in my opinion easy to read cleanup
part of skb_trimmed for any caller of ip{v6,}_mc_check_mld(). No need
to check whether skb == skb_trimmed for a caller for instance,
simply checking whether skb_trimmed exists is enough.


Any objections to remove the "if (skb_shared(skb)) BUG()" part in
pskb_expand_head()? Or would there be any other undesired side
effects in utilising skb_get() like that?

Cheers, Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-11 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-10 21:56 ipv6_mc_check_mld - kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:1128 Brenden Blanco
2015-08-11 20:51 ` Linus Lüssing
2015-08-11 21:47   ` Linus Lüssing [this message]
2015-08-12  0:51     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-08-12  4:56     ` David Miller
2015-08-12 14:26       ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150811214725.GE4402@odroid \
    --to=linus.luessing@c0d3.blue \
    --cc=bblanco@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.