Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] drm/i915: DVO pixel clock check

["Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>]

On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:13:59PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> It is possible the we request to have a mode that has
> higher pixel clock than our HW can support. This patch
> checks if requested pixel clock is lower than the one
> supported by the HW. The requested mode is discarded
> if we cannot support the requested pixel clock.
> 
> This patch applies to DVO.
> 
> V2:
> - removed computation for max pixel clock
> 
> V3:
> - cleanup by removing unnecessary lines
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c
> index fd5e522..2bfc51c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c
> @@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ intel_dvo_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  		     struct drm_display_mode *mode)
>  {
>  	struct intel_dvo *intel_dvo = intel_attached_dvo(connector);
> +	int max_pixclk = to_i915(connector->dev)->max_dotclk;
>  
>  	if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN)
>  		return MODE_NO_DBLESCAN;
> @@ -260,6 +261,9 @@ intel_dvo_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  			return MODE_PANEL;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (mode->clock > max_pixclk)
> +		return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;

I think we'd need to check against the fixed_mode like you did for DP,
when it's present that is.

> +
>  	return intel_dvo->dev.dev_ops->mode_valid(&intel_dvo->dev, mode);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx