From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZPiz7-0003fN-2n for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 03:15:17 +0000 Received: by iodt126 with SMTP id t126so40010173iod.2 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 23:14:44 -0400 From: Bob Copeland Subject: Re: attempting mesh on ath10k Message-ID: <20150813031444.GA18358@localhost> References: <20150706214921.GF23012@localhost> <20150712142532.GA24495@localhost> <20150713014333.GA14152@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Michal Kazior Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:13:59AM +0200, Michal Kazior wrote: > On 13 July 2015 at 03:43, Bob Copeland wrote: > > [trimmed CC to list] > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 10:25:32AM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote: > >> It looks like unicast self-protected action frames (peering) works fine, but > >> broadcast multihop action frames (PREQs) never go over the air. Does > >> this sound familiar to anyone? > > > > Actually, it's any group addressed frame. I tried playing with various > > values for htt_data_tx_ext_tid as well as just using the tid on the frame > > (in mesh group addressed frames still have a qos header with tid=0). > > Just a quick question: did you try applying the sw crypto/raw mode > patch[1] and using it for mesh? > > [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6600721/ Ok, I have this working again against the latest driver, including that patch -- I don't think anything was wrong with it, just didn't have both raw tx and decap set properly and had some baggage from the original patch to jettison. Still a bit WIP but this patchset against openwrt r46584 seems to work for me: http://bobcopeland.com/kernel/wl/20150812/ The mac80211 bits (except for VHT) are upstream but openwrt doesn't have them yet. (BTW thanks to Cococorp for sending me a few APs to make testing a lot easier!) -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/ _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k