From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] introduce __sb_{acquire,release}_write() helpers
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:37:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150813133744.GA16888@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150813133246.GB1091@quack.suse.cz>
On 08/13, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> On Thu 13-08-15 15:17:44, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > so I agree with any naming, I'll update this patch... but perhaps
> > __sb_writers_acquire() without "_nowait" make more sense?
>
> OK, drop _nowait - maybe:
>
> __sb_writers_acquired()
>
> (note the additional 'd' at the end) to suggest that we already hold the lock
> and only want to tell lockdep about it?
Agreed! Will do in v3.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-13 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-11 17:03 [PATCH v2 0/8] change sb_writers to use percpu_rw_semaphore Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-11 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] introduce __sb_{acquire,release}_write() helpers Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-13 9:45 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-13 9:56 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-13 13:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-13 13:32 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-13 13:37 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-08-11 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] fix the broken lockdep logic in __sb_start_write() Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-13 10:02 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-13 13:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-13 13:29 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-11 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] document rwsem_release() in sb_wait_write() Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-13 10:22 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-11 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] percpu-rwsem: introduce percpu_down_read_trylock() Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-11 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] percpu-rwsem: introduce percpu_rwsem_release() and percpu_rwsem_acquire() Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-11 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] percpu-rwsem: kill CONFIG_PERCPU_RWSEM Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-11 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] shift percpu_counter_destroy() into destroy_super_work() Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-13 10:35 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-13 13:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-13 14:09 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-13 15:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-11 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] change sb_writers to use percpu_rw_semaphore Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-13 10:48 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-12 13:11 ` [PATCH v2 9/8] don't fool lockdep in freeze_super() and thaw_super() paths Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-13 11:01 ` Jan Kara
2015-08-13 13:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150813133744.GA16888@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.