From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
dgibson@redhat.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] pseries: define coldplugged devices as "configured"
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:50:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150814052055.GF4587@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439470382-17540-1-git-send-email-lvivier@redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 02:53:02PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> When a device is hotplugged, attach() sets "configured" to
> false, waiting an action from the OS to configure it and then
> to call ibm,configure-connector. On ibm,configure-connector,
> the hypervisor sets "configured" to true.
>
> In case of coldplugged device, attach() sets "configured" to
> false, but firmware and OS never call the ibm,configure-connector
> in this case, so it remains set to false.
>
> It could be harmless, but when we unplug a device, hypervisor
> waits the device becomes configured because for it, a not configured
> device is a device being configured, so it waits the end of configuration
> to unplug it... and it never happens, so it is never unplugged.
Not true for at least logical DR device like CPU. I am able to cleanly
unplug a cold plugged CPU in the patchset I posted at:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc/2015-08/msg00041.html
And this is how the state transitions work for cold plugged CPU devices:
- Cold plugged CPU DRC is explicitly set with allocation_state=USABLE
and isolation_state=UNISOLATED.
- device_del results in drck->detach() that just returns by setting
drc->awaiting_release to true.
- Unplug notification is sent to guest.
- Guest comes back with set_indicator RTAS call for setting isolation_state
to ISOLATED. set_isolation_state() sets drc->configured to false.
- Guest comes back again with set_indicator RTAS call for setting allocation
state to UNUSABLE. set_allocation_state() finalizes the device removal by
calling drck->detach()
- drck->detach() now calls drc->detach_cb() that truly releases the
CPU resource by getting rid of vCPU thread in QEMU.
Regards,
Bharata.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-14 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-13 12:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] pseries: define coldplugged devices as "configured" Laurent Vivier
2015-08-14 5:20 ` Bharata B Rao [this message]
2015-08-14 7:16 ` Laurent Vivier
2015-08-14 7:44 ` Bharata B Rao
2015-08-14 7:46 ` Laurent Vivier
2015-08-23 19:08 ` Michael Roth
2015-08-26 13:04 ` Laurent Vivier
2015-08-14 12:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Laurent Vivier
2015-09-01 5:00 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150814052055.GF4587@in.ibm.com \
--to=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.