All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
	Ricky Zhou <rickyz@chromium.org>, Julien Tinnes <jln@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] unshare: Unsharing a thread does not require unsharing a vm
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 19:59:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150814175944.GA16652@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150813165011.GA25284@redhat.com>

On 08/13, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 08/13, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> > In the sense of document when these tests apply I think it makes a
> > teensy bit of sense to have the CLONE_VM there.  But if you want to send
> > me a cosmetic patch that removes that I will add it to my tree, with the
> > other two patches.
>
> Will do ;)

Yes, I still think it is pointless to check sighand->count if CLONE_VM.

> Eric, I need to run away, I'll try to answer other parts of our confusing
> discussion tomorrow.

No, lest stop it.

Yes, I was wrong, we can't avoid sighand->count check. Somehow I absolutely
forgot that we also need to ensure that unshare(SIGHAND) can't wrongly _fail_.

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-14 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-28 17:15 [PATCH] user_ns: use correct check for single-threadedness Kees Cook
2015-07-28 18:02 ` Rik van Riel
2015-07-28 18:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-07-28 20:55   ` Ricky Zhou
2015-07-28 21:01     ` Kees Cook
2015-08-05 18:13       ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-05 19:40         ` Kees Cook
2015-07-28 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2015-07-28 21:50   ` Kees Cook
2015-07-28 22:11   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-08-05 11:38     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-05 11:53       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2015-08-05 13:13         ` Ricky Zhou
2015-08-05 17:23     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-05 18:00       ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-05 18:52         ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-06 13:06           ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-06 13:44             ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-12  1:17               ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-12 14:40                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-12 15:11                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-12  1:22               ` [PATCH 0/2] userns: Creation logic fixes Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-12  1:24                 ` [PATCH 1/2] unshare: Unsharing a thread does not require unsharing a vm Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-12 17:48                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-12 18:39                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-13 12:55                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-13 15:38                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-13 16:17                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-13 16:27                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-13 16:50                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-14 17:59                                 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-08-12 19:59                     ` [PATCH v2] " Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-13 12:57                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-13 16:01                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-13 16:30                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-13 16:39                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-12  1:25                 ` [PATCH 2/2] userns,pidns: Force thread group sharing, not signal handler sharing Eric W. Biederman
2015-08-12 17:24                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-12  6:29                 ` [PATCH 0/2] userns: Creation logic fixes Kees Cook
2015-08-06 14:35           ` [PATCH] user_ns: use correct check for single-threadedness Oleg Nesterov
2015-08-06 21:16             ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150814175944.GA16652@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jln@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rickyz@chromium.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.