From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Thomas D." <whissi@whissi.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Request for stable 3.18.y and 3.14.y inclusion: Fix for CVE-2015-3290 (nmi)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 06:23:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150817132349.GA26797@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55D1B9FF.7090702@whissi.de>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:39:59PM +0200, Thomas D. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't see the fixes for CVE-2015-3290 in 3.18.y or 3.14.y and can't
> find them quequed so I am requesting the following commits for inclusion in
>
> - 3.18
> - 3.14
Do you have a backport that is tested for these kernel versions that you
can point to for me to include in the 3.14-stable tree?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-17 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-17 10:39 Request for stable 3.18.y and 3.14.y inclusion: Fix for CVE-2015-3290 (nmi) Thomas D.
2015-08-17 13:23 ` Greg KH [this message]
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 0/6] x86/nmi/64: Stable backports for CVE-2015-3290 and CVE-2015-5157 Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 1/6] x86/nmi: Enable nested do_nmi() handling for 64-bit kernels Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 2/6] x86/nmi/64: Remove asm code that saves CR2 Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 3/6] x86/nmi/64: Switch stacks on userspace NMI entry Thomas D
2015-08-18 15:45 ` Jiri Slaby
2015-08-18 17:12 ` Thomas D.
2015-08-18 19:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 0/6] x86/nmi/64: Stable backports for CVE-2015-3290 and CVE-2015-5157 Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 1/6] x86/nmi: Enable nested do_nmi() handling for 64-bit kernels Thomas D
2015-09-29 13:38 ` Greg KH
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 2/6] x86/nmi/64: Remove asm code that saves CR2 Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 3/6] x86/nmi/64: Switch stacks on userspace NMI entry Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 4/6] x86/nmi/64: Improve nested NMI comments Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 5/6] x86/nmi/64: Reorder nested NMI checks Thomas D
2015-08-19 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 6/6] x86/nmi/64: Use DF to avoid userspace RSP confusing nested NMI detection Thomas D
2015-09-29 14:11 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y v2 0/6] x86/nmi/64: Stable backports for CVE-2015-3290 and CVE-2015-5157 Greg KH
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 4/6] x86/nmi/64: Improve nested NMI comments Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 5/6] x86/nmi/64: Reorder nested NMI checks Thomas D
2015-08-17 22:55 ` [PATCH-v3.14.y 6/6] x86/nmi/64: Use DF to avoid userspace RSP confusing nested NMI detection Thomas D
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150817132349.GA26797@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=whissi@whissi.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.