From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, TJ <linux@iam.tj>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 33/51] resources: Make allocate_resource return just fit resource
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 23:21:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150818042135.GZ26431@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438039809-24957-34-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:29:51PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Find all suitable empty slots and pick one just fit, so we could save
> the big slot for needed ones later when we have several pcie switches
> and some bridges get assigned bios and we need to assign others in kernel.
By "just fit," do you mean "best fit"? "Best fit" is a well-known term, so
if that's what you mean, let's use it.
I couldn't quite parse the PCIe switch stuff here. How is that relevant to
this change?
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/resource.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> index 67b58a5..697b8ca 100644
> --- a/kernel/resource.c
> +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct resource_constraint {
> resource_size_t (*alignf)(void *, const struct resource *,
> resource_size_t, resource_size_t);
> void *alignf_data;
> + bool fit;
> };
>
> static DEFINE_RWLOCK(resource_lock);
> @@ -554,12 +555,15 @@ static void resource_clip(struct resource *res, resource_size_t min,
> * alignment constraints
> */
> static int __find_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *old,
> - struct resource *new,
> + struct resource *new, struct resource *avail,
> resource_size_t size,
> struct resource_constraint *constraint)
> {
> struct resource *this = root->child;
> - struct resource tmp = *new, avail, alloc;
> + struct resource tmp = *new, availx, alloc;
> +
> + if (!avail || avail == new)
> + avail = &availx;
>
> tmp.start = root->start;
> /*
> @@ -583,15 +587,16 @@ static int __find_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *old,
> arch_remove_reservations(&tmp);
>
> /* Check for overflow after ALIGN() */
> - avail.start = ALIGN(tmp.start, constraint->align);
> - avail.end = tmp.end;
> - avail.flags = new->flags & ~IORESOURCE_UNSET;
> - if (avail.start >= tmp.start) {
> - alloc.flags = avail.flags;
> - alloc.start = constraint->alignf(constraint->alignf_data, &avail,
> + avail->start = ALIGN(tmp.start, constraint->align);
> + avail->end = tmp.end;
> + avail->flags = new->flags & ~IORESOURCE_UNSET;
> + if (avail->start >= tmp.start) {
> + alloc.flags = avail->flags;
> + alloc.start = constraint->alignf(
> + constraint->alignf_data, avail,
> size, constraint->align);
> alloc.end = alloc.start + size - 1;
> - if (resource_contains(&avail, &alloc)) {
> + if (resource_contains(avail, &alloc)) {
> new->start = alloc.start;
> new->end = alloc.end;
> return 0;
> @@ -608,6 +613,11 @@ next: if (!this || this->end == root->end)
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> +struct good_resource {
> + struct list_head list;
> + struct resource avail;
> + struct resource new;
> +};
> /*
> * Find empty slot in the resource tree given range and alignment.
> */
> @@ -615,7 +625,49 @@ static int find_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new,
> resource_size_t size,
> struct resource_constraint *constraint)
> {
> - return __find_resource(root, NULL, new, size, constraint);
> + int ret = -1;
> + LIST_HEAD(head);
> + struct good_resource *good, *tmp;
> + resource_size_t avail_size = (resource_size_t)-1ULL;
> +
> + if (!constraint->fit)
> + return __find_resource(root, NULL, new, NULL, size,
> + constraint);
> +
> + /* find all suitable ones and add to the list */
> + for (;;) {
> + good = kzalloc(sizeof(*good), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!good)
> + break;
> +
> + good->new.start = new->start;
> + good->new.end = new->end;
> + good->new.flags = new->flags;
> + ret = __find_resource(root, NULL, &good->new, &good->avail,
> + size, constraint);
> + if (ret || __request_resource(root, &good->avail)) {
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + kfree(good);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + list_add(&good->list, &head);
> + }
Allocating memory and building a list in a function that allocates space
seems like a little bit of a hack. I think we're holding resource_lock
anyway; can't we just find a candidate, reserve it, look for another one,
reserve it, release the larger one, and repeat?
> + /* pick up the smallest one and delete the list */
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(good, tmp, &head, list) {
> + if (resource_size(&good->avail) < avail_size) {
> + avail_size = resource_size(&good->avail);
> + new->start = good->new.start;
> + new->end = good->new.end;
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> + list_del(&good->list);
> + __release_resource(&good->avail);
> + kfree(good);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -636,7 +688,8 @@ static int __reallocate_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *old,
> struct resource new = *old;
> struct resource *conflict;
>
> - if ((err = __find_resource(root, old, &new, newsize, constraint)))
> + err = __find_resource(root, old, &new, NULL, newsize, constraint);
> + if (err)
> goto out;
>
> if (resource_contains(&new, old)) {
> @@ -675,6 +728,7 @@ out:
> * @align: alignment requested, in bytes
> * @alignf: alignment function, optional, called if not NULL
> * @alignf_data: arbitrary data to pass to the @alignf function
> + * @fit: only allocate fit range.
> *
> * Caller need to hold resource_lock if needed.
> */
> @@ -685,7 +739,7 @@ static int __allocate_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new,
> const struct resource *,
> resource_size_t,
> resource_size_t),
> - void *alignf_data)
> + void *alignf_data, bool fit)
> {
> int err;
> struct resource_constraint constraint;
> @@ -698,6 +752,7 @@ static int __allocate_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new,
> constraint.align = align;
> constraint.alignf = alignf;
> constraint.alignf_data = alignf_data;
> + constraint.fit = fit;
>
> if (new->parent) {
> /* resource is already allocated, try reallocating with
> @@ -738,7 +793,7 @@ int allocate_resource(struct resource *root, struct resource *new,
>
> write_lock(&resource_lock);
> ret = __allocate_resource(root, new, size, min, max, align,
> - alignf, alignf_data);
> + alignf, alignf_data, true);
> write_unlock(&resource_lock);
>
> return ret;
> --
> 1.8.4.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-18 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-27 23:29 [PATCH v3 00/51] PCI: Resource allocation cleanup for v4.3 Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 01/51] PCI: Cleanup res_to_dev_res() printout for addon resources Yinghai Lu
2015-08-17 22:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-18 21:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 02/51] PCI: Reuse res_to_dev_res in reassign_resources_sorted Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 03/51] PCI: Use correct align for optional only resources during sorting Yinghai Lu
2015-08-17 23:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-18 19:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 04/51] PCI: Optimize bus align/size calculation during sizing Yinghai Lu
2015-08-17 23:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-18 20:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 05/51] PCI: Optimize bus align/size calculation for optional " Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 06/51] PCI: Don't add too much optional size for hotplug bridge mmio Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 07/51] PCI: Reorder resources list for must/optional resources Yinghai Lu
2015-08-17 23:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-18 20:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 08/51] PCI: Remove duplicated code for resource sorting Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 09/51] PCI: Rename pdev_sort_resources to pdev_check_resources Yinghai Lu
2015-08-17 23:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-18 21:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-08-18 21:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 10/51] PCI: Treat ROM resource as optional during realloc Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 11/51] PCI: Add debug printout during releasing partial assigned resources Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 12/51] PCI: Simplify res reference using in __assign_resourcs_sorted Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 13/51] PCI: Separate realloc list checking after allocation Yinghai Lu
2015-08-17 23:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-18 21:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 14/51] PCI: Add __add_to_list() Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 15/51] PCI: Cache window alignment value Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 16/51] PCI: Check if resource is allocated before pci_assign Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 17/51] PCI: Separate out save_resources/restore_resource Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 18/51] PCI: Move comment to pci_need_to_release() Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 19/51] PCI: Separate must+optional assigning to another function Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 20/51] PCI: Skip must+optional if there is no optional addon Yinghai Lu
2015-08-17 23:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-18 22:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 21/51] PCI: Move saved required resource list out of must+optional assigning Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 22/51] PCI: Add alt_size allocation support Yinghai Lu
2015-08-18 0:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-19 5:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 23/51] PCI: Add support for more than two alt_size under same bridge Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 24/51] PCI: Better support for two alt_size Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 25/51] PCI: Fix size calculation with old_size on rescan path Yinghai Lu
2015-08-18 4:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-19 6:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 26/51] PCI: Don't add too much optional size for hotplug bridge io Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 27/51] PCI: Move ISA ioport align out of calculate_iosize Yinghai Lu
2015-08-18 4:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-19 6:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 28/51] PCI: Unifiy calculate_size for io port and mmio Yinghai Lu
2015-08-18 4:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-19 6:37 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 29/51] PCI: Allow optional only io resource must size to be 0 Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 30/51] PCI: Unify skip_ioresource_align() Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 31/51] PCI: Kill macro checking for bus io port sizing Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 32/51] resources: Split out __allocate_resource() Yinghai Lu
2015-08-18 4:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-19 6:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 33/51] resources: Make allocate_resource return just fit resource Yinghai Lu
2015-08-18 4:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-08-19 7:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 34/51] PCI: Check pref compatible bit for mem64 resource of pcie device Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 35/51] PCI: Only treat non-pef mmio64 as pref if all bridges has MEM_64 Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 36/51] PCI: Add has_mem64 for host_bridge Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 37/51] PCI: Only treat non-pef mmio64 as pref if host-bridge has_mem64 Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 38/51] PCI: Restore pref mmio allocation logic for hostbridge without mmio64 Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 39/51] sparc/PCI: Add mem64 resource parsing for root bus Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 40/51] sparc/PCI: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for 64-bit resource in of parsing Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:29 ` [PATCH v3 41/51] powerpc/PCI: " Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 42/51] of/PCI: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 for 64-bit resource Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 43/51] PCI: Treat optional as must in first try for bridge rescan Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 44/51] PCI: Get new realloc size for bridge for last try Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 45/51] PCI: Don't release sibiling bridge resources during hotplug Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 46/51] PCI: Don't release fixed resource for realloc Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 47/51] PCI: Claim fixed resource during remove/rescan path Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 48/51] PCI: Set resource to FIXED for lsi devices Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 49/51] PCI, x86: Add pci=assign_pref_bars to re-allocate pref bars Yinghai Lu
[not found] ` <1438039809-24957-1-git-send-email-yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-27 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 50/51] PCI: Introduce resource_disabled() Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-07-27 23:30 ` [PATCH v3 51/51] PCI: Don't set flags to 0 when assign resource fail Yinghai Lu
2015-08-17 22:48 ` [PATCH v3 00/51] PCI: Resource allocation cleanup for v4.3 Bjorn Helgaas
2015-08-18 18:43 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150818042135.GZ26431@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@iam.tj \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.