From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49485)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1ZRc6y-00065f-8R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 04:19:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1ZRc6x-0005pL-2S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 04:19:12 -0400
Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([2001:bc8:30d7:100::1]:37319)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1ZRc6w-0005p8-T1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 04:19:11 -0400
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:19:08 +0200
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Message-ID: <20150818081908.GH23508@aurel32.net>
References: <20150729150147.GO11361@aurel32.net> <55B99F95.8010603@gmx.net>
	<20150730075252.GT11361@aurel32.net> <55B9DD60.8020801@gmx.net>
	<20150730085500.GV11361@aurel32.net> <55BF7FF7.8080308@gmx.net>
	<CAMO55f=S0HDn7LMYWVxka+=GCDxym-B3pXdcJEA3y1k1-3pF9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<55BFC62E.4030001@gmx.net>
	<CAMO55f=DVv8EHQFHsAEsYe-AtPBH7WpSFo28R1kYm3GKwpvOLQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<55D2B3B5.80309@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55D2B3B5.80309@gmx.net>
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Debian 7.8.0 SPARC64 on qemu - anything i can do
 to speedup the emulation?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Dennis Luehring <dl.soluz@gmx.net>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@gmail.com>, Karel Gardas <gardask@gmail.com>

On 2015-08-18 06:25, Dennis Luehring wrote:
> Am 06.08.2015 um 11:00 schrieb Karel Gardas:
> >Denis, if NetBSD is fast in qemu and if it provides sparc64 user-land,
> >perhaps also its GCC is sparc64 binary and if so, then it would be
> >good if you do your original benchmark of compiling pugixml.cpp and
> >write the numbers here for comparison? I would certainly appreciate it
> >since I'll not get to this testing in foreseeable future again.
> 
> i've re-redone the benchmarks with Debian and NetBSD SPARC64
> 
> benchmarks:
> 
> compilation pugixml 1.6 pugixml.cpp:
> g++ src/pugixml.cpp -g -Wall -Wextra -Werror -pedantic -std=c++0x -c
> -MMD -MP
> 
> host: ~3 sec
> guest-debian: ~3:52.6 (32bit gcc, virtio)
> guest-debian: ~3:01.7 (32bit gcc, virtio, using the qcow2 image from an
> ramfs ramdisk)
> guest-netbsd: ~3:27.6 (64bit gcc, non-virtio)
> guest-netbsd: ~2:51.6 (64bit gcc, non-virtio, using the qcow2 image from an
> ramfs ramdisk)
> 
> runtime Aurelien Jarnos prime.c
> gcc prime.c -o prime.out -lm
> 
> host: ~2 sec
> guest-debian(-m32): ~3:37.5
> guest-debian(-m64): ~11 sec
> guest-netbsd(only -m64): ~11 sec
> 
> Aurelien Jarnos explained the "11 sec" boost running prime.c using -m64,
> but still the NetBSD 64bit gcc needs 3:27.6 to compile pugixml.cpp - its
> just one file, 1GB of RAM, no swapping
> 
> using a ramdisk gives even under debian(with virtio) a 50sek speedup, netbsd
> (without virtio) just gains 30sek

How big is the source file and the output file? I find strange that I/O
impacts so much for a compilation which should be CPU bounded. Maybe try
to add the -pipe argument to g++.

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net