From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Mihai Neagu <mihai.neagu@ni.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, adrian.papp@ni.com, vicentiu.neagoe@ni.com
Subject: Re: IRQ affinity on Linux guest
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:20:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150820232051.GA23600@potion.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55D5E12C.9050704@ni.com>
2015-08-20 17:16+0300, Mihai Neagu:
> Here is how IRQ affinity is configured on guest at startup, in an init.d
> script:
>
> echo 1 > /proc/irq/default_smp_affinity
> for x in /proc/irq/*/smp_affinity;
> do
> echo 1 > $x
> done 2> /dev/null
>
> The command line for starting the hardware accelerated VM:
> qemu-system-x86-64 -enable-kvm -kernel bzImage -hda rootfs.ext2 -append \
> "root=/dev/sda console=ttyS0 rw" -nographic -cpu qemu64 -snapshot -smp 2 \
> -m 2048
>
> On the hardware accelerated guest, 'cat /proc/interrupts' shows:
> CPU0 CPU1
> 0: 26 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 7 4 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 4: 1137 523 IO-APIC-edge serial
> 8: 0 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc0
> 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
> 11: 4971 4 IO-APIC-fasteoi eth0
> 12: 66 64 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 14: 1958 714 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix
> 15: 4512 63 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix
> ...
> Interrupts are serviced on both cores, even though affinity is set to 1.
KVM's APIC balances interrupts -- until you set the affinity (probably
near the end of boot process), both CPUs are going to receive roughly
the same amount but after directing subsequent interrupts to CPU0, CPU1
shouldn't receive more.
Please verify that CPU0 is not receiving all interrupts by doing a
difference between two `cat /proc/interrupts` after the affinity was
set. (CPU0 has higher numbers in your excerpt, which makes me suspect
that it works as expected.)
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-20 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-20 14:16 IRQ affinity on Linux guest Mihai Neagu
2015-08-20 23:20 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2015-08-21 12:33 ` Mihai Neagu
2015-08-21 14:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150820232051.GA23600@potion.redhat.com \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.papp@ni.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mihai.neagu@ni.com \
--cc=vicentiu.neagoe@ni.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.