From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Context-track syscalls before enabling interrupts
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:50:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150821075035.GB9511@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150819171007.GA21717@lerouge>
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I want to have a real hook to call that says "switch to IRQ context from
> > CONTEXT_USER" or "switch to IRQ context from CONTEXT_KERNEL" (aka noop), but
> > that doesn't currently exist.
>
> You're not answering _why_ you want that.
So we'd have a comprehensive, 100% coverage, self-sufficient set of callbacks that
track the kernel's current context state at the points where the context switches
actually occur - not just something cobbled together heterogenously. The low level
x86 asm code was rather messy in this area, better organization would be welcome,
I don't think we can overdo it.
( I'm assuming here that it can all be done for zero or negative cost, and that
the result will be correct and won't hurt existing users in any fashion. )
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-21 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-18 19:11 [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Context-track syscalls before enabling interrupts Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-18 22:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-18 22:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-18 23:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-18 23:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-19 17:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-21 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-08-21 13:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-08-19 0:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-19 15:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150821075035.GB9511@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.