From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / LPSS: Ignore 10ms delay for Braswell and Baytrail Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:44:55 +0300 Message-ID: <20150824094455.GP30005@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1440090968-17728-1-git-send-email-srinidhi.kasagar@intel.com> <20150820123805.GG30005@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20150821121152.GA26813@intel-desktop> <20150821063641.GK30005@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20150821132015.GN30005@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20150824125147.GA23677@intel-desktop> <20150824085959.GO30005@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20150824170920.GA32764@intel-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:58875 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751834AbbHXJo7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 05:44:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150824170920.GA32764@intel-desktop> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Kasagar, Srinidhi" Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, Kumar P Mahesh , Heikki Krogerus On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:39:21PM +0530, Kasagar, Srinidhi wrote: > Ok, then we have two options: > > Let's drop LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY for BYT and duplicate the common devices which > are shared between Braswell and BYT & keep LPSS_NO_D3_DELAY only for BSW. That sounds the safest option for now. > OR > Use the cpu id to detect the platform which I believe not a good idea.. > > Because of few devices, I do not think it make sense to compromise on > the significant reduction in the resume delay. I agree.