From: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com>
To: cpaul@redhat.com
Cc: "Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Jerome Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Benjamin Tissoires" <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DRM - radeon: Don't link train DisplayPort on HPD until we get the dpcd
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:47:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150824134740.GA1941@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440180972-29580-1-git-send-email-cpaul@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 02:16:12PM -0400, cpaul@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Stephen Chandler Paul <cpaul@redhat.com>
>
> Most of the time this isn't an issue since hotplugging an adaptor will
> trigger a crtc mode change which in turn, causes the driver to probe
> every DisplayPort for a dpcd. However, in cases where hotplugging
> doesn't cause a mode change (specifically when one unplugs a monitor
> from a DisplayPort connector, then plugs that same monitor back in
> seconds later on the same port without any other monitors connected), we
> never probe for the dpcd before starting the initial link training. What
> happens from there looks like this:
>
> - GPU has only one monitor connected. It's connected via
> DisplayPort, and does not go through an adaptor of any sort.
>
> - User unplugs DisplayPort connector from GPU.
>
> - Change in HPD is detected by the driver, we probe every
> DisplayPort for a possible connection.
>
> - Probe the port the user originally had the monitor connected
> on for it's dpcd. This fails, and we clear the first (and only
> the first) byte of the dpcd to indicate we no longer have a
> dpcd for this port.
>
> - User plugs the previously disconnected monitor back into the
> same DisplayPort.
>
> - radeon_connector_hotplug() is called before everyone else,
> and tries to handle the link training. Since only the first
> byte of the dpcd is zeroed, the driver is able to complete
> link training but does so against the wrong dpcd, causing it
> to initialize the link with the wrong settings.
>
> - Display stays blank (usually), dpcd is probed after the
> initial link training, and the driver prints no obvious
> messages to the log.
>
> In theory, since only one byte of the dpcd is chopped off (specifically,
> the byte that contains the revision information for DisplayPort), it's
> not entirely impossible that this bug may not show on certain monitors.
> For instance, the only reason this bug was visible on my ASUS PB238
> monitor was due to the fact that this monitor using the enhanced framing
> symbol sequence, the flag for which is ignored if the radeon driver
> thinks that the DisplayPort version is below 1.1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Chandler Paul <cpaul@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
This should be added to stable
cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
> index 94b21ae..5a2cafb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_connectors.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,11 @@ void radeon_connector_hotplug(struct drm_connector *connector)
> if (!radeon_hpd_sense(rdev, radeon_connector->hpd.hpd)) {
> drm_helper_connector_dpms(connector, DRM_MODE_DPMS_OFF);
> } else if (radeon_dp_needs_link_train(radeon_connector)) {
> + /* Don't try to start link training before we
> + * have the dpcd */
> + if (!radeon_dp_getdpcd(radeon_connector))
> + return;
> +
> /* set it to OFF so that drm_helper_connector_dpms()
> * won't return immediately since the current state
> * is ON at this point.
> --
> 2.4.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-24 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-21 18:16 [PATCH] DRM - radeon: Don't link train DisplayPort on HPD until we get the dpcd cpaul
2015-08-21 22:06 ` Alex Deucher
2015-08-21 22:06 ` Alex Deucher
2015-08-24 13:47 ` Jerome Glisse [this message]
2015-08-24 13:50 ` Deucher, Alexander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150824134740.GA1941@gmail.com \
--to=j.glisse@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=cpaul@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.