diff for duplicates of <20150825050329.GC21569@cumulusnetworks.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index a110303..e387e37 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ On Mon Aug 17 11:00, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
 > disabled or not plugged. But I'm not absolute sure about this.
 > 
 > At least on a test platform that allow disable devices will show those
-> devices off-line (/sys/bus/acpi/devices/INTABCD:xy/status == 0).
+> devices off-line (/sys/bus/acpi/devices/INTABCD:xy/status = 0).
 
 I'm always surprised how hard it is to tell what *can't* happen in ACPI.
 How about a conditional call to LoadTable()?  Seems like that would mess
@@ -13,3 +13,8 @@ up the :xy.  Moot point, I think you're on the right track in your RFC
 patch.
 
 		--Dustin
+
+_______________________________________________
+lm-sensors mailing list
+lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
+http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 03bdad2..4927ae3 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
  "ref\020150815151302.GA10020@roeck-us.net\0"
  "ref\055D1948C.6080501@linux.intel.com\0"
  "ref\055D1948C.6080501-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0Dustin Byford <dustin-qUQiAmfTcIp+XZJcv9eMoEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [RFC 0/1] i2c: acpi: revert setting a \"stable\" device name\0"
- "Date\0Mon, 24 Aug 2015 22:03:29 -0700\0"
+ "From\0Dustin Byford <dustin@cumulusnetworks.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC 0/1] i2c: acpi: revert setting a \"stable\" device name\0"
+ "Date\0Tue, 25 Aug 2015 05:03:29 +0000\0"
  "To\0Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>\0"
  "Cc\0Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>"
   Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
@@ -23,13 +23,18 @@
  "> disabled or not plugged. But I'm not absolute sure about this.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> At least on a test platform that allow disable devices will show those\n"
- "> devices off-line (/sys/bus/acpi/devices/INTABCD:xy/status == 0).\n"
+ "> devices off-line (/sys/bus/acpi/devices/INTABCD:xy/status = 0).\n"
  "\n"
  "I'm always surprised how hard it is to tell what *can't* happen in ACPI.\n"
  "How about a conditional call to LoadTable()?  Seems like that would mess\n"
  "up the :xy.  Moot point, I think you're on the right track in your RFC\n"
  "patch.\n"
  "\n"
- "\t\t--Dustin"
+ "\t\t--Dustin\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "lm-sensors mailing list\n"
+ "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org\n"
+ http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
 
-9a16008a3c06aafa2f621b42a2f226c927823c89f1900896cb7311369348060e
+6d43859266e44f67733b226b7b8f43e6acd3fd360d5e452ffd237ff92b992159
