From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix tsk->pi_lock isn't held when do_set_cpus_allowed()
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:05:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825100527.GO16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLU436-SMTP97219F013A6E029CAEB5D280610@phx.gbl>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 03:59:54PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -2376,8 +2376,12 @@ void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk, struct cpumask *pmask)
>
> void cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> rcu_read_lock();
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->pi_lock, flags);
> do_set_cpus_allowed(tsk, task_cs(tsk)->effective_cpus);
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->pi_lock, flags);
> rcu_read_unlock();
Aside from the double lock thing that was already pointed out, I think
this is wrong, because the select_task_rq() call can already have
pi_lock held.
Taking it again would result in a deadlock.
Consider for instance:
try_to_wake_up()
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(->pi_lock)
select_task_rq()
select_ballback_rq()
cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback()
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(->pi_lock)
The problem is with the migration path and should be fixed there.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-25 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-25 7:59 [PATCH] sched: fix tsk->pi_lock isn't held when do_set_cpus_allowed() Wanpeng Li
2015-08-25 8:13 ` Leo Yan
2015-08-25 8:24 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-25 8:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-25 8:38 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-25 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-08-25 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-25 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <BLU437-SMTP7261DF7A82716F49242C7B80610@phx.gbl>
2015-08-27 22:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-28 1:49 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-25 10:18 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-27 13:47 ` T. Zhou
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-25 7:56 Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150825100527.GO16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.