From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, dyoung@redhat.com,
dzickus@redhat.com,
open list: ABI/API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] watchdog: Add watchdog device control through sysfs attributes
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 04:49:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825231917.GD13340@dhcppc13.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55DCA3C1.5050307@roeck-us.net>
On 25/08/2015:10:20:01 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 08/25/2015 09:45 AM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> >Hi Guenter,
> >
> >On 21/08/2015:11:18:12 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> >>This patch adds following attributes to watchdog device's sysfs interface.
> >
> >Please see if you can review it.
> >
> >Does this patch look fine to you? If yes then do I need to resend it by removing
> >RFC tag.
> >
>
> I didn't have time to review your patch in detail. Sorry, but please keep in mind
> that this is all volunteer work for me.
It's understandable. Sorry for my impatience. Please take your time.
>
> I don't feel comfortable with modifying the watchdog state through sysfs.
> That changes the ABI substantially, since it is no longer necessary to have
> an application to activate the watchdog. It also messes up internal state keeping,
> since there is now no longer a well defined state indicating that the kernel
> expects user space to send heartbeats, or if the kernel needs to do it (in the
> driver or, with the patch set I submitted a couple of weeks ago, in the watchdog
> core).
I will be OK with removing 'start'.
>
> Given that, and I really don't have time to look into it more deeply,
> I put the whole thing on a back burner for now.
>
No issue, will wait :-)
~Pratyush
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-25 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-21 17:48 [PATCH RFC] watchdog: Add watchdog device control through sysfs attributes Pratyush Anand
2015-08-21 17:48 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <d9ac417a3bc1c6846f1ddfcd3cd07e5a92865c19.1440179209.git.panand-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-25 16:45 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-08-25 16:45 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <55DCA3C1.5050307@roeck-us.net>
2015-08-25 23:19 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2015-08-29 16:51 ` [RFC] " Guenter Roeck
2015-08-29 16:51 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20150829165124.GA22494-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-08-30 14:16 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-08-30 14:16 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <55E31A13.80503@roeck-us.net>
2015-08-30 18:17 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <55E34DEA.7010206@roeck-us.net>
2015-08-31 3:04 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-08-31 3:11 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <55E3CDBC.2040109@roeck-us.net>
2015-08-31 5:26 ` Pratyush Anand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150825231917.GD13340@dhcppc13.redhat.com \
--to=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.