All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] xfs_repair: check v5 filesystem attr block header sanity
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:45:02 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150826004502.GR714@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150826003259.23973.34038.stgit@birch.djwong.org>

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 05:32:59PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Check the v5 fields (uuid, blocknr, owner) of attribute blocks for
> obvious errors while scanning xattr blocks.  If the ownership info
> is incorrect, kill the block.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

Why hasn't the buffer verifier done this validation?

> @@ -1564,6 +1602,13 @@ process_longform_attr(
>  	if (bp->b_error == -EFSBADCRC)
>  		(*repair)++;
>  
> +	/* is this block sane? */
> +	if (__check_attr_header(mp, bp, ino)) {
> +		*repair = 0;
> +		libxfs_putbuf(bp);
> +		return 1;
> +	}

As you can see the above hunk has a bad CRC check from the verifier,
and if the attr header is wrong then the verifier should be setting
bp->b_error == -EFSCORRUPTED.

So shouldn't this simply be:

+	if (bp->b_error == -EFSCORRUPTED) {
+		*repair = 0;
+		libxfs_putbuf(bp);
+		return 1;
+	}
+

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-26  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-26  0:32 [PATCH v3 00/11] xfsprogs fuzzing fixes Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  0:32 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs_repair: set args.geo in dir2_kill_block Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  0:32 ` [PATCH 02/11] libxfs: verifier should set buffer error when da block has a bad magic number Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  0:32 ` [PATCH 03/11] libxfs: fix XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_* macros to return negative error codes Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  0:32 ` [PATCH 04/11] libxfs: clear buffer state flags in libxfs_getbuf and variants Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  1:02   ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-26  4:05     ` Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  5:23     ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  0:32 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs_repair: ignore "repaired" flag after we decide to clear xattr block Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  0:32 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs_repair: check v5 filesystem attr block header sanity Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  0:45   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-08-26  0:59     ` Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  1:15       ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-26  4:50         ` Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  6:20           ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-26  0:33 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs_repair: force not-so-bad bmbt blocks back through the verifier Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  0:54   ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-26  3:59     ` Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  5:24     ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  0:33 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs_io: support reflinking and deduping file ranges Darrick J. Wong
2015-09-22  2:17   ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-28 17:03     ` Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  0:33 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs_db: enable blocktrash for checksummed filesystems Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  0:33 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs_db: trash the block at the top of the cursor stack Darrick J. Wong
2015-08-26  0:33 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs_db: enable blockget for v5 filesystems Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150826004502.GR714@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.