From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"Waiman.Long@hp.com" <Waiman.Long@hp.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Add generic support for relaxed atomics
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:41:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150826104100.GB30466@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150826042834.GA10432@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com>
Hi Boqun,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 05:28:34AM +0100, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 05:54:36PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Will Deacon (8):
> > atomics: add acquire/release/relaxed variants of some atomic
> > operations
> > asm-generic: rework atomic-long.h to avoid bulk code duplication
> > asm-generic: add relaxed/acquire/release variants for atomic_long_t
> > lockref: remove homebrew cmpxchg64_relaxed macro definition
> > locking/qrwlock: implement queue_write_unlock using smp_store_release
> > locking/qrwlock: make use of acquire/release/relaxed atomics
> > include/llist: use linux/atomic.h instead of asm/cmpxchg.h
>
> Should we step further to privatize asm/cmpxchg.h entirely? Keep it only
> included in arch/*?
>
> Because after your next patch, in some configurations, asm/cmpxchg.h of
> ARM only provides the definition of {cmpxchg,xchg}_relaxed, others are
> built in linux/atomic.h. Further more, other architecture may implement
> asm/cmpxchg.h similarly in the future. So, IIUC, we actually don't
> guarantee all cmpxchg(), xchg() and their variants are defined in
> asm/cmpxchg.h.
>
> Though current users of asm/cmpxchg.h outside arch/* are fine,
> because they all happen to have got linux/atomic.h included. But we'd
> better change the current users and call out that asm/cmpxchg.h is
> privatized in the document.
>
> > ARM: atomics: define our SMP atomics in terms of _relaxed operations
>
>
> Consider this patch maybe? I did a simple build test on X86.
I'm not sure that the addition to Documentation/atomic_ops.txt is really
worth it, but either way:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
It's probably best to send this as a standalone patch, since the relaxed
parts are already queued in -tip.
Will
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: [PATCH] atomics,cmpxchg: Privatize the inclusion of asm/cmpxchg.h
>
> After commit:
>
> atomics: add acquire/release/relaxed variants of some atomic operations
>
> Architectures may only provide {cmp,}xchg_relaxed definitions in
> asm/cmpxchg.h. Other variants, such as {cmp,}xchg, may be built in
> linux/atomic.h, which means simply including asm/cmpxchg.h may not get
> the definitions of all the{cmp,}xchg variants. Therefore, we should
> privatize the inclusions of asm/cmpxchg.h to keep it only included in
> arch/* and replace the inclusions outside with linux/atomic.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/atomic_ops.txt | 4 ++++
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/phy/phy-rcar-gen2.c | 3 +--
> drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/atomic_ops.txt b/Documentation/atomic_ops.txt
> index b19fc34..c9d1cac 100644
> --- a/Documentation/atomic_ops.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/atomic_ops.txt
> @@ -542,6 +542,10 @@ The routines xchg() and cmpxchg() must provide the same exact
> memory-barrier semantics as the atomic and bit operations returning
> values.
>
> +Note: If someone wants to use xchg(), cmpxchg() and their variants,
> +linux/atomic.h should be included rather than asm/cmpxchg.h, unless
> +the code is in arch/* and can take care of itself.
> +
> Spinlocks and rwlocks have memory barrier expectations as well.
> The rule to follow is simple:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi.c
> index 81640f8..968383e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> -#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
> #include "net_driver.h"
> #include "nic.h"
> #include "io.h"
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rcar-gen2.c b/drivers/phy/phy-rcar-gen2.c
> index 39d9b29..117b495 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-rcar-gen2.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rcar-gen2.c
> @@ -17,8 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> -
> -#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
>
> #define USBHS_LPSTS 0x02
> #define USBHS_UGCTRL 0x80
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c b/drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c
> index a031570..81c0888 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/speakup/selection.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> #include <linux/tty.h>
> #include <linux/tty_flip.h>
> -#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
>
> #include "speakup.h"
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-26 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-06 16:54 [PATCH v5 0/8] Add generic support for relaxed atomics Will Deacon
2015-08-06 16:54 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] atomics: add acquire/release/relaxed variants of some atomic operations Will Deacon
2015-08-12 12:34 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/atomics: Add _{acquire|release|relaxed}() " tip-bot for Will Deacon
2015-08-06 16:54 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] asm-generic: rework atomic-long.h to avoid bulk code duplication Will Deacon
2015-08-12 12:34 ` [tip:locking/core] locking, asm-generic: Rework " tip-bot for Will Deacon
2015-08-06 16:54 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] asm-generic: add relaxed/acquire/release variants for atomic_long_t Will Deacon
2015-08-12 12:35 ` [tip:locking/core] locking, asm-generic: Add _{relaxed|acquire|release}() variants for 'atomic_long_t' tip-bot for Will Deacon
2015-08-06 16:54 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] lockref: remove homebrew cmpxchg64_relaxed macro definition Will Deacon
2015-08-12 12:35 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/lockref: Remove homebrew cmpxchg64_relaxed() " tip-bot for Will Deacon
2015-08-06 16:54 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] locking/qrwlock: implement queue_write_unlock using smp_store_release Will Deacon
2015-08-12 12:35 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/qrwlock: Implement queue_write_unlock( ) using smp_store_release() tip-bot for Will Deacon
2015-08-06 16:54 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] locking/qrwlock: make use of acquire/release/relaxed atomics Will Deacon
2015-08-12 12:36 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/qrwlock: Make use of _{acquire|release|relaxed}() atomics tip-bot for Will Deacon
2015-08-06 16:54 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] include/llist: use linux/atomic.h instead of asm/cmpxchg.h Will Deacon
2015-08-12 12:36 ` [tip:locking/core] locking, include/llist: Use linux/ atomic.h " tip-bot for Will Deacon
2015-08-06 16:54 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] ARM: atomics: define our SMP atomics in terms of _relaxed operations Will Deacon
2015-08-12 12:36 ` [tip:locking/core] locking, ARM, atomics: Define our SMP atomics in terms of _relaxed() operations tip-bot for Will Deacon
2015-08-07 15:13 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] Add generic support for relaxed atomics Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-07 16:29 ` Will Deacon
2015-08-26 4:28 ` Boqun Feng
2015-08-26 10:41 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-08-26 11:35 ` Boqun Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150826104100.GB30466@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.