All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Cc: bfields@fieldses.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] net: sunrpc: fix tracepoint Warning: unknown op '->'
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:22:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150826135256.GI13340@dhcppc13.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150826091302.61c53f77@tlielax.poochiereds.net>

On 26/08/2015:09:13:02 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:10:44 +0530
> Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > `perf stat  -e sunrpc:svc_xprt_do_enqueue true` results in
> > 
> > Warning: unknown op '->'
> > Warning: [sunrpc:svc_xprt_do_enqueue] unknown op '->'
> > 
> > Similar warning for svc_handle_xprt as well.
> > 
> > Actually TP_printk() should never dereference an address saved in the ring
> > buffer that points somewhere in the kernel. There's no guarantee that that
> > object still exists (with the exception of static strings).
> > 
> > Therefore change all the arguments for TP_printk(), so that it references
> > values existing in the ring buffer only.
> > 
> > While doing that, also fix another possible bug when argument xprt could be
> > NULL and TP_fast_assign() tries to access it's elements.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
> > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > ---
> > Changes since V1:
> > - struct sockaddr memcopied to ring buffer so that its internal element can
> > be accessed while printing %pIS.
> > 
> >  include/trace/events/sunrpc.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
> > index fd1a02cb3c82..75a16fcc0795 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
> > @@ -529,18 +529,23 @@ TRACE_EVENT(svc_xprt_do_enqueue,
> >  
> >  	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> >  		__field(struct svc_xprt *, xprt)
> > +		__field_struct(struct sockaddr_storage, ss)
> >  		__field(struct svc_rqst *, rqst)
> 
> nit: I think you should be able to avoid storing "rqst" now.

Yes.

> 
> > +		__field(int, pid)
> > +		__field(unsigned long, flags)
> >  	),
> >  
> >  	TP_fast_assign(
> > -		__entry->xprt = xprt;
> > +		__entry->xprt = xprt,
> 
> Shouldn't that line end with ';'?
> 

I think, both should be OK.. I just copied this hunk from svc_xprt_dequeue.

> > +		xprt ? memcpy(&__entry->ss, &xprt->xpt_remote, sizeof(__entry->ss)) : memset(&__entry->ss, 0, sizeof(__entry->ss));
> >  		__entry->rqst = rqst;
> > +		__entry->pid = rqst? rqst->rq_task->pid : 0;
> > +		__entry->flags = xprt ? xprt->xpt_flags : 0;
> >  	),
> >  
> >  	TP_printk("xprt=0x%p addr=%pIScp pid=%d flags=%s", __entry->xprt,
> > -		(struct sockaddr *)&__entry->xprt->xpt_remote,
> > -		__entry->rqst ? __entry->rqst->rq_task->pid : 0,
> > -		show_svc_xprt_flags(__entry->xprt->xpt_flags))
> > +		(struct sockaddr *)&__entry->ss,
> > +		__entry->pid, show_svc_xprt_flags(__entry->flags))
> >  );
> >  
> >  TRACE_EVENT(svc_xprt_dequeue,
> > @@ -589,16 +594,20 @@ TRACE_EVENT(svc_handle_xprt,
> >  	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> >  		__field(struct svc_xprt *, xprt)
> >  		__field(int, len)
> > +		__field_struct(struct sockaddr_storage, ss)
> > +		__field(unsigned long, flags)
> >  	),
> >  
> >  	TP_fast_assign(
> > -		__entry->xprt = xprt;
> > +		__entry->xprt = xprt,
> > +		xprt ? memcpy(&__entry->ss, &xprt->xpt_remote, sizeof(__entry->ss)) : memset(&__entry->ss, 0, sizeof(__entry->ss));
> >  		__entry->len = len;
> > +		__entry->flags = xprt ? xprt->xpt_flags : 0;
> >  	),
> >  
> >  	TP_printk("xprt=0x%p addr=%pIScp len=%d flags=%s", __entry->xprt,
> > -		(struct sockaddr *)&__entry->xprt->xpt_remote, __entry->len,
> > -		show_svc_xprt_flags(__entry->xprt->xpt_flags))
> > +		(struct sockaddr *)&__entry->ss,
> > +		__entry->len, show_svc_xprt_flags(__entry->flags))
> >  );
> >  #endif /* _TRACE_SUNRPC_H */
> >  
> 
> Looks good otherwise. Thanks for fixing this!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>

Thanks :-)

~Pratyush

      reply	other threads:[~2015-08-26 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-26 12:40 [PATCH V2] net: sunrpc: fix tracepoint Warning: unknown op '->' Pratyush Anand
2015-08-26 13:13 ` Jeff Layton
2015-08-26 13:52   ` Pratyush Anand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150826135256.GI13340@dhcppc13.redhat.com \
    --to=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeff.layton@primarydata.com \
    --cc=jlayton@primarydata.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.