Re: bcache-tools build errors

[Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 09:38:56PM +0300, Mike Krinkin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> after bcachefs announce i decided to try it and downloaded
> bcache-tools dev branch as explained here
> http://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/, and failed to build it with
> gcc 4.9.2 (Ubuntu 4.9.2-0ubuntu1~14.04), the following fix solved
> problem for me:

Thanks - applied.

> diff --git a/bcacheadm-query.c b/bcacheadm-query.c
> index e11b98d..6e3499c 100644
> --- a/bcacheadm-query.c
> +++ b/bcacheadm-query.c
> @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ int cmd_status(NihCommand *command, char *const *args)
>  
>  			buf[len] = '\0';
>  			dev_names[dev_count] = dev_name(buf);
> -			snprintf(dev_path, MAX_PATH, "%s/%s", "/dev",
> +			snprintf(dev_path, sizeof(dev_path), "%s/%s", "/dev",
>  					dev_names[dev_count]);
>  			sb = query_dev(dev_path, false, false,
>  					true, dev_uuid);
> @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ int cmd_status(NihCommand *command, char *const *args)
>  		int j;
>  
>  		uuid_unparse(m->uuid.b, uuid_str);
> -		snprintf(dev_state, MAX_PATH, "%s",
> +		snprintf(dev_state, sizeof(dev_state), "%s",
>                           cache_state[CACHE_STATE(m)]);
>  
>  		for (j = 0; j < dev_count; j++) {
> @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ int cmd_status(NihCommand *command, char *const *args)
>  				break;
>  			} else if (j == dev_count - 1) {
>  				if (!strcmp(cache_state[CACHE_STATE(m)], "active"))
> -					snprintf(dev_state, MAX_PATH, "%s", "missing");
> +					snprintf(dev_state, sizeof(dev_state), "%s", "missing");
>  				break;
>  			}
>  		}
> diff --git a/probe-bcache.c b/probe-bcache.c
> index 1b85c4a..cc04f53 100644
> --- a/probe-bcache.c
> +++ b/probe-bcache.c
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
>  #define __USE_FILE_OFFSET64
>  #define _XOPEN_SOURCE 500
>  
> -#include <blkid.h>
> +#include <blkid/blkid.h>
>  #include <fcntl.h>
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <stdbool.h>
> 
> I don't know what the problem is with blkid headers, but MAX_PATH
> is 256 while dev_path and dev_state only 32 bytes long. Although
> it would scarcely cause any problems, with -Werror flag gcc turns
> warning into error.
> 
> I hope bcache mailing list is right place to report things like
> this.