From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 17:46:17 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix Message-ID: <20150829154617.GF20679@hermes.click-hack.org> References: <8655AC8285F53F42A4B1B3CAB3092C47235FC2D7@IVKEX2.fkfs.de> <8655AC8285F53F42A4B1B3CAB3092C47235FD2F2@IVKEX2.fkfs.de> <8655AC8285F53F42A4B1B3CAB3092C47235FD31D@IVKEX2.fkfs.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8655AC8285F53F42A4B1B3CAB3092C47235FD31D@IVKEX2.fkfs.de> Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Question about priority coupling in primary and secondary mode List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Rothermel, Thomas" Cc: "xenomai@xenomai.org" On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 03:23:28PM +0000, Rothermel, Thomas wrote: > Furthermore I can't use RTnet, because all other network nodes > don't use it. That is a wrong reason not to use RTnet. > Then I found out that from Xenomai v2.6.x on, the option > XENO_OPT_PRIOCPL was disabled by default, and I recompiled the > kernel with XENO_OPT_PRIOCPL enabled. Unfortunately that didn't > help. As far as I understand, this option should solve my > problem... The root thread priority coupling does not solve everything. In particular, when a thread is suspended waiting for an interrupt, the primary mode activity has priority over handling the non real-time interrupt. -- Gilles. https://click-hack.org