From: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com>
To: clm@fb.com
Cc: jbacik@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: cleanup btrfs_balance profile validity checks
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 21:45:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150830214549.GA1409@gmail.com> (raw)
Improve readability by generalizing the profile validity checks,
I had to read through those if statements half a dozen times on my
first try just to get an idea of what's happening there.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index fbe7c10..d23bc26 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -3454,6 +3454,15 @@ static void __cancel_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
atomic_set(&fs_info->mutually_exclusive_operation_running, 0);
}
+/* Non-zero return value signifies invalidity */
+static inline int balance_relocate_invalid(struct btrfs_balance_args *bctl_arg,
+ u64 allowed)
+{
+ return ((bctl_arg->flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) &&
+ (!alloc_profile_is_valid(bctl_arg->target, 1) ||
+ (bctl_arg->target & ~allowed)));
+}
+
/*
* Should be called with both balance and volume mutexes held
*/
@@ -3511,27 +3520,21 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl,
if (num_devices > 3)
allowed |= (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 |
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6);
- if ((bctl->data.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) &&
- (!alloc_profile_is_valid(bctl->data.target, 1) ||
- (bctl->data.target & ~allowed))) {
+ if (balance_relocate_invalid(&bctl->data, allowed)) {
btrfs_err(fs_info, "unable to start balance with target "
"data profile %llu",
bctl->data.target);
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- if ((bctl->meta.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) &&
- (!alloc_profile_is_valid(bctl->meta.target, 1) ||
- (bctl->meta.target & ~allowed))) {
+ if (balance_relocate_invalid(&bctl->meta, allowed)) {
btrfs_err(fs_info,
"unable to start balance with target metadata profile %llu",
bctl->meta.target);
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- if ((bctl->sys.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) &&
- (!alloc_profile_is_valid(bctl->sys.target, 1) ||
- (bctl->sys.target & ~allowed))) {
+ if (balance_relocate_invalid(&bctl->sys, allowed)) {
btrfs_err(fs_info,
"unable to start balance with target system profile %llu",
bctl->sys.target);
--
2.5.0
next reply other threads:[~2015-08-30 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-30 21:45 Alexandru Moise [this message]
2015-09-22 13:03 ` [PATCH] btrfs: cleanup btrfs_balance profile validity checks David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150830214549.GA1409@gmail.com \
--to=00moses.alexander00@gmail.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.