From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:01:56 +0200 From: Bukuli Norbert Message-ID: <20150831130156.GE8044@bukuli-linux.Protecta.local> References: <20150831111046.GD8044@bukuli-linux.Protecta.local> <55E44B07.1050402@xenomai.org> <55E44C72.1070503@xenomai.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55E44C72.1070503@xenomai.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Current state of Freescale LS1021A Xenomai support List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe Gerum , xenomai@xenomai.org On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 02:45:38PM +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On 08/31/2015 02:39 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > On 08/31/2015 01:10 PM, Bukuli Norbert wrote: > >> Hello, Everyone! > >> > >> I have a few questions about the current state of Freescale LS1021A > >> SoC and TWR-LS1021A evaluation board support. > >> > >> I saw on the website, that the `QorIQ LS1: LS1021' SoC is supported, > >> but I could not figure out, what line of Xenomai supports it. The > >> stable one (2.6) or the upcoming release (3)? > >> > >> I prefer the dual-kernel architecture, because of our application > >> strict realtime needs, so I need a Xenomai supported version. > >> > >> The linux kernel found in Freescale BSP is derived from v3.12.37, > >> which is currently not supported by Xenomai. On the other hand, > >> xenomai supported linux kernel versions (3.8.13, 3.10.32, 3.14.17) > >> don't have LS1021 support. > >> > >> Newer vanilla kernels support LS1021A, but there are no i-pipe patches > >> for those versions. > >> > >> Any documentation, git trees, and corresponding information would > >> be highly appreciated. > > > > The port was done over a custom 3.14.44 kernel targeting the ls1. You > > may need to port the I-pipe over 3.19+, or wait for the customer to > > release these bits. > > > > Alternatively you could forward port ipipe-3.10 to 3.12-fsl. > > -- > Philippe. Thanks for the quick answer I will check both solutions. -- Best regards Norbert Bukuli -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: