From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752845AbbIBHjs (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 2 Sep 2015 03:39:48 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:33794 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752590AbbIBHjq (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 2 Sep 2015 03:39:46 -0400
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:39:42 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: =?utf-8?B?5bmz5p2+6ZuF5bezIC8gSElSQU1BVFXvvIxNQVNBTUk=?= 
	<masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: "'Jiri Olsa'" <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/insn: perf tools: Add a few new x86 instructions
Message-ID: <20150902073942.GA6002@gmail.com>
References: <1441029522-20235-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
 <20150901085432.GE6315@gmail.com>
 <55E59734.4080205@intel.com>
 <20150901195716.GA924@kernel.org>
 <20150902055909.GB1978@krava.brq.redhat.com>
 <50399556C9727B4D88A595C8584AAB3752502944@GSjpTKYDCembx32.service.hitachi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <50399556C9727B4D88A595C8584AAB3752502944@GSjpTKYDCembx32.service.hitachi.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU，MASAMI <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> wrote:

> > sure, np you can use my ack
> 
> I'm also OK for this patch. I just concern that is OK for Adrian too? 
> Since this ensures all the copied code should be dead copy (not modified anymore),
> if we want a different instruction decoding routine, we have to break the test
> anyway.

So the idea would be to not break anything, only warn in a non-fatal question. 
This protects against unbisectable universes being created via simple git merges 
where updates meet but testing of tooling isn't done.

Thanks,

	Ingo