All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, ak@linux.intel.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org, kan.liang@intel.com, dsahern@gmail.com,
	adrian.hunter@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: fix per-pkg event reporting bug
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 12:01:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150903100134.GD13114@krava.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441199871-7384-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 03:17:51PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:

SNIP

> +	/*
> +	 * we do not consider an event that has not run as a good
> +	 * instance to mark a package as used (skip=1). Otherwise
> +	 * we may run into a situation where the first CPU in a package
> +	 * is not running anything, yet the second is, and this function
> +	 * would mark the package as used after the first CPU and would
> +	 * not read the values from the second CPU.
> +	 */
> +	if (!(vals->run && vals->ena))
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	s = cpu_map__get_socket(cpus, cpu);
>  	if (s < 0)
>  		return -1;
> @@ -235,7 +247,7 @@ process_counter_values(struct perf_stat_config *config, struct perf_evsel *evsel
>  	static struct perf_counts_values zero;
>  	bool skip = false;
>  
> -	if (check_per_pkg(evsel, cpu, &skip)) {
> +	if (check_per_pkg(evsel, aggr, cpu, &skip)) {

should we pass 'count' instead o 'aggr' ?

jirka

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-03 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-02 13:17 [PATCH] perf stat: fix per-pkg event reporting bug Stephane Eranian
2015-09-02 20:26 ` Andi Kleen
2015-09-03 10:05   ` Jiri Olsa
2015-09-03 10:01 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2015-09-03 11:48   ` Stephane Eranian
2015-09-03 12:01     ` Jiri Olsa
2015-09-03 12:05       ` Stephane Eranian
2015-09-03 12:13         ` Jiri Olsa
2015-09-03 12:16           ` Stephane Eranian
2015-09-03 12:25             ` Jiri Olsa
2015-09-03 16:53               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-03 17:12                 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-09-03 20:42                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-03 21:37                     ` Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150903100134.GD13114@krava.redhat.com \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.