From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Hemant Kumar <hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
paulus@samba.org, scottwood@freescale.com,
sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: Add kvm_perf.h for powerpc
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 17:51:45 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150904205145.GB3475@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55E54A4F.6090205@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Em Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:18:47PM +0530, Hemant Kumar escreveu:
> >Should I try to process the 5 together, applying thest two first?
> Yes, this patchset needs to be applied before applying the other patchset,
> since there is a direct dependency on these two for the tooling part to
> work.
> >I see there are no acks from powerpc arch maintainers, how should we
> >proceed here? If there are no problems with the arch bits, and if it is
> >just to enable the tooling part, again, should I process the 5 as just
> >one series?
> The reason to split the earlier patchset into two was to separate the
> tooling/perf/ and arch/powerpc/ side patches, as asked by Michael..
> Here is the link to that discussion :
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg86916.html
> If Michael is ok with the patches, you can process all the 5 patches
> together. Michael?
Michael?
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-04 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-31 6:48 [PATCH v6 1/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: Add kvm_perf.h for powerpc Hemant Kumar
2015-08-31 6:48 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] perf, kvm/powerpc: Add hcall related info to kvm_perf.h Hemant Kumar
2015-08-31 6:48 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: " Hemant Kumar
2015-08-31 20:13 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: Add kvm_perf.h for powerpc Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-01 6:48 ` Hemant Kumar
2015-09-04 20:51 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2015-09-07 5:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-08 4:56 ` Hemant Kumar
2015-09-08 8:33 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-08 15:10 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150904205145.GB3475@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.