Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] sched/numa: Convert sched_numa_balancing to a static_branch

[Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

* Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> [2015-09-06 12:01:10]:


Hi Wanpeng Li, 


> Hi Srikar,
> On 8/12/15 12:24 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> >Variable sched_numa_balancing toggles numa_balancing feature. Hence
> >moving from a simple read mostly variable to a more apt static_branch.
> >
> >Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> >Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> This commit breaks Peter's queue:
> 
> kernel/sched/fair.c: In function ?task_numa_fault?:
> kernel/sched/fair.c:2072: error: implicit declaration of function
> ?static_branch_likely?
> kernel/sched/fair.c: In function ?task_tick_fair?:
> kernel/sched/fair.c:7867: error: implicit declaration of function
> ?static_branch_unlikely?
> make[1]: *** [kernel/sched/fair.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> kernel/sched/core.c:2116: warning: data definition has no type or storage
> class

Thanks for reporting.  Can you please confirm if you have the commit
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=11276d5306b8e5b438a36bbff855fe792d7eaa61

>From 11276d5306b8e5b438a36bbff855fe792d7eaa61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:09:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] locking/static_keys: Add a new static_key interface


-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju