From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
wei.liu2@citrix.com, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/vtd/iommu: permit group devices to passthrough in relaxed mode
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:44:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150908094445.GD11097@zion.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441673834-22891-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 08:57:14AM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> Currently we don't allow passing through any group devices which are
> sharing same RMRR entry since it would break security among VMs. And
> indeed, we expect we can figure out a better way to handle this kind
> of case completely.
>
> But before the group assignment gets implemented, we might make this
> permission dependent on our RMRR policy. So, now it would be allowed
> in the relaxed mode.
>
Is this targeting 4.6? I think so.
> CC: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
> CC: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
> index 836aed5..4249cfa 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
> @@ -2310,12 +2310,16 @@ static int intel_iommu_assign_device(
FWIW the comment before this hunk also needs to be updated.
> PCI_DEVFN2(bdf) == devfn &&
> rmrr->scope.devices_cnt > 1 )
> {
> + u32 relaxed = flag & XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_RELAXED;
> +
> printk(XENLOG_G_ERR VTDPREFIX
> - " cannot assign %04x:%02x:%02x.%u"
> + " Currently its %s to assign %04x:%02x:%02x.%u"
"it's" or "it is"
> " with shared RMRR at %"PRIx64" for Dom%d.\n",
> + relaxed ? "risky" : "disallowed",
> seg, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn),
> rmrr->base_address, d->domain_id);
> - return -EPERM;
> + if ( !relaxed )
> + return -EPERM;
> }
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-08 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-08 0:57 [PATCH] xen/vtd/iommu: permit group devices to passthrough in relaxed mode Tiejun Chen
2015-09-08 9:44 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2015-09-08 9:59 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150908094445.GD11097@zion.uk.xensource.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.