From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't try to use DDR DVFS on CHV when disabled in the BIOS
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 19:10:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150909161005.GX29811@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150909154104.GI32324@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 04:41:04PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:28:50PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:16:11PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Would it make sense to disable dvfs after a failure as well,
> > > then the user is shown a single DRM_ERROR at runtime and we should
> > > recover (by not going to the full WM next time)?
> >
> > I wouldn't expect any failures after we've determined that it works.
> > That would indicate Punit going belly up or something, and then I'm
> > not sure anything would work anymore.
>
> We didn't expect any before either :) And it sounds like you are arguing
> that we should be reducing the noise from the victims as well :)
Well, I think I'll still leave it as is. People have generally been
opposed to adding code to deal with conditions that should never
happen in real life.
Should I be proven wrong, you can smack me on the head with a big
"told you so!" sign ;)
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-09 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-08 18:05 [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't try to use DDR DVFS on CHV when disabled in the BIOS ville.syrjala
2015-09-08 20:16 ` Chris Wilson
2015-09-09 15:28 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-09-09 15:41 ` Chris Wilson
2015-09-09 16:10 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2015-09-10 9:58 ` Jani Nikula
2015-09-08 20:34 ` Clint Taylor
2015-09-10 12:43 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150909161005.GX29811@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.