From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 22:00:50 -0700
Subject: Preceding a method call with (void)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXs5wVn+mtUWjmYfmYbVxoCDPu1MNdbdvY91+vcoUZxm6joOg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGXs5wVn+mtUWjmYfmYbVxoCDPu1MNdbdvY91+vcoUZxm6joOg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150910050050.GA29808@kroah.com>
To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org
List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 07:52:49AM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I intend to send a patch to the kernel, and my question is about
> preceding a method with (void).

Don't :)

> My question is:
> Will sending a patch to the kernel with code with (void) preceding
> method calls make sense ?

Nope.

> or should I avoid it in  the first place (again, I did not saw such a
> pattern in the kernel)

Avoid it please.

Just curious, what code do you want to change to add a (void) to?

thanks,

greg k-h