All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: fsyscall
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:28:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150910132809.GA27602@mail.hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHse=S-9oORtSHoNx1Hety1oC=unmWAxw_REUOLeQhaf3im_Kw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:27:06PM +0100, David Drysdale wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> > Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> writes:
> > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
> (From this perspective, the limitation that seccomp-bpf programs only
> have access to syscall arguments by-value is actually a help -- the filter
> can't look into user memory, so can't be fooled by having memory
> contents changed underneath it.  Of course, if the eBPF stuff ever
> changes that we should watch out...)

Yup and I'm quite sure I've seen that raised as a reason to refuse
supporting exactly that.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-10 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-08 22:35 RFC: fsyscall Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-08 22:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-08 23:07   ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-08 23:18     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-09  0:25       ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-09 17:27         ` David Drysdale
2015-09-09 19:33           ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-10 13:35             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-09-10 13:28           ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2015-09-10 13:43         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-09-10 13:51           ` David Drysdale
2015-09-10 14:01             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-09-10 14:03               ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-09-10 14:04                 ` Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150910132809.GA27602@mail.hallyn.com \
    --to=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=drysdale@google.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.