Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq : powernv: Report Pmax throttling if capped below nominal frequency

[Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>]

On 14-09-15, 14:01, Shilpasri G Bhat wrote:
> Log a 'critical' message if the max frequency is reduced below nominal
> frequency. We already log 'info' message if the max frequency is
> capped below turbo frequency. CPU should guarantee atleast nominal
> frequency, but not turbo frequency in all system configurations and
> environments. So report the pmax throttling with severity when Pmax is
> dipped below nominal frequency.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
> - Modified the printk messages as per Viresh's suggestion.
> 
>  drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> index 64994e1..cb50138 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> @@ -327,8 +327,14 @@ static void powernv_cpufreq_throttle_check(void *data)
>  		if (chips[i].throttled)
>  			goto next;
>  		chips[i].throttled = true;
> -		pr_info("CPU %d on Chip %u has Pmax reduced to %d\n", cpu,
> -			chips[i].id, pmsr_pmax);
> +		if (pmsr_pmax < powernv_pstate_info.nominal)
> +			pr_crit("CPU %d on Chip %u has Pmax reduced below nominal frequency (%d < %d)\n",
> +				cpu, chips[i].id, pmsr_pmax,
> +				powernv_pstate_info.nominal);
> +		else
> +			pr_info("CPU %d on Chip %u has Pmax reduced below turbo frequency (%d < %d)\n",
> +				cpu, chips[i].id, pmsr_pmax,
> +				powernv_pstate_info.max);
>  	} else if (chips[i].throttled) {
>  		chips[i].throttled = false;
>  		pr_info("CPU %d on Chip %u has Pmax restored to %d\n", cpu,

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-- 
viresh