From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mykola Golub Subject: Re: osd: new pool flags: noscrub, nodeep-scrub Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:48:49 +0300 Message-ID: <20150915054848.GA15539@gmail.com> References: <20150911064256.GA12899@gmail.com> <20150911124704.GB12899@gmail.com> <20150911132422.GC12899@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:38795 "EHLO mail-wi0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751469AbbIOFsw (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2015 01:48:52 -0400 Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so11364664wic.1 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 22:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150911132422.GC12899@gmail.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil Cc: Gregory Farnum , ceph-devel On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:24:23PM +0300, Mykola Golub wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 05:59:56AM -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > > > I wonder if, in addition, we should also allow scrub and deep-scrub > > intervals to be set on a per-pool basis? > > ceph osd pool set [deep-]scrub_interval N ? > > I could do this too. https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/5922 -- Mykola Golub