From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?unknown-8bit?q?J=CE=B5an?= Sacren Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:34:28 -0600 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue 1/8] e1000: clean up the useless 'continue' statement In-Reply-To: <9EC98ADF-EA6D-4BDC-A442-F42BB805FA84@intel.com> References: <1442212070-24937-1-git-send-email-sakiwit@gmail.com> <1442212070-24937-2-git-send-email-sakiwit@gmail.com> <32D3D43C-B677-4C70-8915-3B07B1175C66@intel.com> <20150915053501.GA3881@mail.gmail.com> <9EC98ADF-EA6D-4BDC-A442-F42BB805FA84@intel.com> Message-ID: <20150916153428.GB3881@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: From: "Rustad, Mark D" Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:24:39 +0000 > > > On Sep 14, 2015, at 10:35 PM, J?an Sacren wrote: [...] > > The goto statement might be executed if and only if at the last loop out > > of a total of 32. I think we need to rewrite the checking logic here: > > > > ... > > if (tmp != 0 && tmp != 0xFF) > > break; > > > > if (i == 31) > > goto err_eeprom; > > ... > > > > What do you think? > > This is ok too, but this makes it look to me like the if and goto > should really be outside the loop, so after the loop one would have: > > if (i == 32) > goto err_eeprom; I think moving the above check out of the loop is a good idea, yet it still retains the same issue as doing the unnecessary checking. How about the following patch: diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c index 74dc15055971..4c3ca7c9ce49 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c @@ -1199,15 +1199,14 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) { hw->phy_addr = i; e1000_read_phy_reg(hw, PHY_ID2, &tmp); - if (tmp == 0 || tmp == 0xFF) { - if (i == 31) - goto err_eeprom; - continue; - } else - break; + + if (tmp != 0 && tmp != 0xFF) + goto no_err; } - } + goto err_eeprom; + } +no_err: /* reset the hardware with the new settings */ e1000_reset(adapter);