All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	nm@ti.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: of_property_count_u32_elems() can return errors
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:13:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150917181328.GQ23081@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46a47430b8d65f509d47fe3ad1264c6b23086d61.1442508974.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On 09/17, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> @@ -889,13 +889,22 @@ static int _opp_add_dynamic(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq,
>  /* TODO: Support multiple regulators */
>  static int opp_get_microvolt(struct dev_pm_opp *opp, struct device *dev)
>  {
> +	struct property *prop;
>  	u32 microvolt[3] = {0};
>  	int count, ret;
>  
> -	count = of_property_count_u32_elems(opp->np, "opp-microvolt");
> -	if (!count)
> +	/* Missing property isn't a problem, but an invalid entry is */
> +	prop = of_find_property(opp->np, "opp-microvolt", NULL);

Prop isn't used anywhere so why not remove the local variable and
test the result of this call inside the if condition?

> +	if (!prop)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	count = of_property_count_u32_elems(opp->np, "opp-microvolt");
> +	if (count < 0) {

We can't test count for -EINVAL to detect the missing property
because -EINVAL is also returned on a non-multiple of u32 length
property? Maybe we shouldn't worry about that case and turn
-EINVAL into 0.

> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: Invalid opp-microvolt property (%d)\n",
> +			__func__, count);
> +		return count;

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-17 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-17 17:00 [PATCH] PM / OPP: of_property_count_u32_elems() can return errors Viresh Kumar
2015-09-17 17:00 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-17 18:13 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-09-19  3:21   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-19 22:22     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-22 16:35       ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150917181328.GQ23081@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.