From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] kvmclock: fix ABI breakage from PVCLOCK_COUNTS_FROM_ZERO. Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:43:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20150921154340.GA4214@potion.brq.redhat.com> References: <1442591670-5216-1-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com> <20150920225742.GA27666@amt.cnet> <20150921151209.GA2734@potion.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Luiz Capitulino To: Marcelo Tosatti Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150921151209.GA2734@potion.brq.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org 2015-09-21 17:12+0200, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99: > 2015-09-20 19:57-0300, Marcelo Tosatti: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 05:54:28PM +0200, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99= wrote: >>> This patch series will be disabling PVCLOCK_COUNTS_FROM_ZERO flag a= nd is >>> RFC because I haven't explored many potential problems or tested it= =2E >>=20 >> The justification to disable PVCLOCK_COUNTS_FROM_ZERO is because you >> haven't explored potential problems or tested it? Sorry can't parse = it. I missed that one, sorry. PVCLOCK_COUNTS_FROM_ZERO is disabled because it breaks ABI. Not testing nor ruling out all problems is a justification for RFC. (This patch series - will be disabling PVCLOCK_COUNTS_FROM_ZERO flag and - is RFC because I haven't explored many potential problems or tested it [this patch series])