Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 07/16] io: add abstract QIOChannel classes

["Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 02:19:27PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 18/09/2015 15:19, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > +    QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_FD_PASS  = (1 << 0),
> > +    QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_SHUTDOWN = (1 << 1),
> > +    QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_DELAY    = (1 << 2),
> > +    QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_CORK     = (1 << 3),
> 
> TCP_NODELAY and TCP_CORK are just hints; I think it is okay to just
> ignore them if not supported.  You obviously disagree, so the question
> is why? :)

Well I was just trying not to second guess what future uses we might
have of the QIOChannel API, so I went for the approach of providing a
way to probe any optional features upfront. Code doesn't have to use
this if it doesn't want to - it can just ignore errors from the API
call later.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|