From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754784AbbIWNuY (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:50:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49272 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754234AbbIWNuW (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:50:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:50:12 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Matt Fleming , Vinson Lee , rostedt@goodmis.org, Jiri Olsa , raphael.beamonte@gmail.com, "H. Peter Anvin" , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , David Ahern , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Namhyung Kim , linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Michael Petlan Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] tools lib api fs: Remove debugfs, tracefs and findfs objects Message-ID: <20150923135012.GC2024@krava.redhat.com> References: <1441180605-24737-15-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> <20150923082302.GA2867@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150923083906.GB2024@krava.redhat.com> <20150923134456.GD5041@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150923134456.GD5041@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:44:56AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: SNIP > New stuff normally comes with new 'perf test' entries, Intel PT borrowed > the kernel x86 instruction decoder: added a 'perf test' entry, AFAIK > there was no similar test for it in the kernel proper, IIRC Masami plans > to do it. > > The attr one you can look at: > > [acme@zoo linux]$ ls -la tools/perf/tests/attr/test-* | wc -l > 33 > > > AFAIK we have: > > - 'perf test' for perf specific functionality > > - 'make -f tests/make' for building > > - build framework tests > > > > I 'try' to run those before sending anything out, but we dont have > > automated thing that would run it any time Arnaldo push new perf/core. > > Well, I do run it in multiple distros, like RHEL5, RHEL6 and RHEL7 > besides Fedora 21. > > We're getting used to tools/{lib,include}/ so this happened, but > otherwise I don't feel like there are that many problems cropping up as > you seem to think :-\ > > Of course, in these days of CI, I'd love if someone would hook 'make -C > tools/perf build-test' and 'perf test' somewhere to be run for every > changeset. yep, thats what I meant.. having this hooked up to your perf/core would be big help jirka