From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bjorn Andersson Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] firmware: qcom: scm: Peripheral Authentication Service Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:20:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20150924192005.GG24668@usrtlx11787.corpusers.net> References: <1443038172-19189-1-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> <20150924191307.GA7146@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150924191307.GA7146@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Andy Gross , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-soc@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Thu 24 Sep 12:13 PDT 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 09/23, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > + > > +int __qcom_scm_pas_mem_setup(u32 peripheral, phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t size) > > Maybe we should make addr and size u32s as well. Kumar requested > we take the same approach for other scm calls. > So you're saying that on arm64 we're always going to load firmware in the lower 32 bits of memory? Not sure what the benefit of doing this conversion higher up in the layers are, but sure we could do it... Regards, Bjorn