From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:37062 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756410AbbI0QRW (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2015 12:17:22 -0400 Received: from localhost by e35.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 10:17:21 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.19]) by d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF771FF002D for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 10:08:27 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by b03cxnp08027.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t8RGHIm160096714 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:17:18 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t8RGHI6F028918 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 10:17:18 -0600 Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:17:15 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix typo in quick quiz 4.17 Message-ID: <20150927161715.GG30373@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <1443355322-11907-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1443355322-11907-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> Sender: perfbook-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 02:02:02PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Good catch, applied. Thanx, Paul > --- > toolsoftrade/toolsoftrade.tex | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/toolsoftrade/toolsoftrade.tex b/toolsoftrade/toolsoftrade.tex > index 4e85a9c..ccbe0ad 100644 > --- a/toolsoftrade/toolsoftrade.tex > +++ b/toolsoftrade/toolsoftrade.tex > @@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ rights to assume that the value of \co{goflag} would never change. > \QuickQuizAnswer{ > It depends. > If the per-thread variable was accessed only from its thread, > - and never from a single handler, then no. > + and never from a signal handler, then no. > Otherwise, it is quite possible that \co{ACCESS_ONCE()} is needed. > We will see examples of both situations in > Section~\ref{sec:count:Signal-Theft Limit Counter Implementation}. > -- > 2.5.0 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe perfbook" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >