All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Vaishali Thakkar <vthakkar1994@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:25:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151001082534.GB1903@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK-LDbJ=YEtrN9p9QdjP2TyCKrhrQqqdKNpq_71+03PFQ81zoA@mail.gmail.com>


* Vaishali Thakkar <vthakkar1994@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Vaishali Thakkar <vthakkar1994@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Ping!
> >
> > Pong. This patch is already upstream.
> 
> Oops! Sorry. I just realized that you already applied it but it is
> still showing me in linux-next
> when grepped for it and is blocking the road in removing the macro definition.

So I think what you saw in linux-next is another usage of the old macro, in the 
same file - which usage arrived since you did the first patch.

> 
> Sorry for the noise.

np.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-01  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-17  5:27 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE Vaishali Thakkar
2015-08-04  8:52 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE() tip-bot for Vaishali Thakkar
2015-10-01  4:51 ` [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Remove use of macro DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE Vaishali Thakkar
2015-10-01  8:07   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-10-01  8:21     ` Vaishali Thakkar
2015-10-01  8:25       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-10-01  8:33         ` Vaishali Thakkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151001082534.GB1903@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vthakkar1994@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.