From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, oleg@redhat.com,
umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] sched, x86: Kill saved_preempt_count
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 17:40:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151001154046.GC23943@lerouge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150930072304.488021307@infradead.org>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:10:44AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> With the introduction of the context switch preempt_count invariant,
> and the demise of PREEMPT_ACTIVE, its pointless to save/restore the
> per-cpu preemption count, it must always be the same.
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Good news as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-01 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-30 7:10 [PATCH v2 00/12] sched: Killing PREEMPT_ACTIVE Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] sched: Simplify INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 9:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 20:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-01 13:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] sched: Rework TASK_DEAD preemption exception Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] sched: Create preempt_count invariant Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 9:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 13:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] sched: Add preempt argument to __schedule() Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] sched: Fix trace_sched_switch() Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] sched: Stop setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01 15:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] sched: Robustify preemption leak checks Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 9:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] sched: Simplify preempt_count tests Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01 15:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] sched, x86: Kill saved_preempt_count Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01 15:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] sched: Kill PREEMPT_ACTIVE Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01 15:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] sched: More notrace Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] sched: Add preempt_count invariant check Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 9:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151001154046.GC23943@lerouge \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.