From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [libmnl] Creating netlink socket with SOCK_CLOEXEC flag
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 20:50:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151001185059.GD2911@alphalink.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151001165005.GA2107@salvia>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 06:50:05PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 06:16:04PM +0200, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm looking at how libmnl could be used with CLOEXEC netlink sockets.
> > Of course, one can use the
> > nl = mnl_socket_open();
> > fd = mnl_socket_get_fd(nl);
> > fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, O_CLOEXEC);
> > sequence, but this is racy in multi-threaded programs, where another
> > thread could fork()/execve() between the mnl_socket_open() and the
> > fcntl() calls. Applying the CLOEXEC flag at socket creation closes this
> > issue.
> >
> > There are three different approaches I can think of:
> > 1- Make mnl_socket_open() unconditionally add the SOCK_CLOEXEC flag in
> > its socket() call.
> > 2- Define mnl_socket_open2(), similar to mnl_socket_open() but with an
> > additional flags parameter that would be passed to socket().
> > 3- Tell user to create its netlink socket with the required flags and
> > use it with mnl_socket_fdopen().
> >
> > Solution #1 would provide safe default for all users, but that'd be an
> > ABI change. Also decision would need to be made wrt. platforms not
> > handling SOCK_CLOEXEC.
> >
> > Solution #2 is more generic and allows all SOCK_* flags defined by the
> > plateform. But it's a bit more inelegant and exports yet another function
> > to allocate an mnl socket.
>
> I'd suggest you add mnl_socket_open2().
Ok, will do.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-01 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-01 16:16 [libmnl] Creating netlink socket with SOCK_CLOEXEC flag Guillaume Nault
2015-10-01 16:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-10-01 18:50 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151001185059.GD2911@alphalink.fr \
--to=g.nault@alphalink.fr \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.