From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751236AbbJBFzf (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2015 01:55:35 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:58692 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750767AbbJBFze (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2015 01:55:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 07:55:31 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Alexander Kapshuk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ver_linux: libcpp.patch Message-ID: <20151002055531.GC19354@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 09:17:42PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > Neither 'libg++.so', nor 'libstdc++.so' were found where the current > implementation expects them to be found in the distros below. > > > Gentoo Linux > Debian 6.0.10 > Oracle Linux Server release 7.1 > > The proposed implementation relies on 'ldconfig' to locate the libraries > in question. 'Sed' is used to do the text processing. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kapshuk These are great, thanks for breaking them all up into individual, reviewable patches. Unfortunately I have no idea what order to apply them in :( Can you resend them as a patch series, properly numbered (i.e. [PATCH XX/YY]) so that I have a chance to apply them correctly? thanks, greg k-h