From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoffer Dall Subject: Re: [RFT - PATCH v2 0/2] KVM/arm64: add fp/simd lazy switch support Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:25:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20151005172538.GK9011@cbox> References: <1442964843-11953-1-git-send-email-m.smarduch@samsung.com> <20151005154540.GJ9011@cbox> <5612A201.6030500@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5612A201.6030500@samsung.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mario Smarduch Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, marc.zyngier@arm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 09:14:57AM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote: > Hi Christoffer, > I just managed to boot qemu arm32 up on arm64 (last Fri - thanks for the tip > - there were few other issue to clean up), so let me retest it again. Also I > noticed some refactoring would help both 32 and 64 bit patches. > > Yes I could provide a the user space tests as well. > I'd like those regardless as I generally test my queue before pushing it to next. Thanks, -Christoffer From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall) Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:25:38 +0200 Subject: [RFT - PATCH v2 0/2] KVM/arm64: add fp/simd lazy switch support In-Reply-To: <5612A201.6030500@samsung.com> References: <1442964843-11953-1-git-send-email-m.smarduch@samsung.com> <20151005154540.GJ9011@cbox> <5612A201.6030500@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20151005172538.GK9011@cbox> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 09:14:57AM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote: > Hi Christoffer, > I just managed to boot qemu arm32 up on arm64 (last Fri - thanks for the tip > - there were few other issue to clean up), so let me retest it again. Also I > noticed some refactoring would help both 32 and 64 bit patches. > > Yes I could provide a the user space tests as well. > I'd like those regardless as I generally test my queue before pushing it to next. Thanks, -Christoffer