From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjEb5-0005dI-VJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:51:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjEb0-0001sM-NC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:51:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjEb0-0001s5-If for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:51:02 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 01:50:57 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20151006015015-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1442253680-8657-1-git-send-email-lvivier@redhat.com> <56127913.1090301@redhat.com> <20151006000149-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <5612F3F8.7010803@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5612F3F8.7010803@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/2] Improve -help List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laurent Vivier Cc: marcandre.lureau@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:04:40AM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > > On 05/10/2015 23:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 03:20:19PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote: > >> no more comments, it should mean it's ok ? > >> > >> Can someone merge this or just say "stop this, I don't want that"... > >> > >> Laurent > > > > I'm afraid as a first step, we need to bring some order into -help. > > I agree with your comments, but the aim of this series is not to change > the content, only the container. That's my point, with content as it is, changing the container makes things worse not better IMHO. > It will be easy to add sections once this done. > > > I also suspect that a good place to start doing that is the man page. > > Man page and help are generated from qemu-options.hx, so improving one > is also > improving the other, but I think I'm not the good guy to rewrite a man > page... I'm a mechanic, not a writer :) > > Thanks, > Laurent