From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 06 Oct 2015 13:42:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:46433 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27009649AbbJFLmbGumyb (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:42:31 +0200 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.15.2/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t96BgRqT026600; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:42:27 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t96BgRMt026599; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:42:27 +0200 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:42:27 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: Thierry Reding , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: jz4740: qi_lb60: Remove unused linux/leds_pwm.h include Message-ID: <20151006114226.GD26251@linux-mips.org> References: <1444048957-29486-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <561272EC.2080602@metafoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <561272EC.2080602@metafoo.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 49448 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 02:54:04PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 10/05/2015 02:42 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > > The board code never sets up a leds-pwm device, so including the header > > is not necessary. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding > > Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen Somehow your email with the Ack got duplicated and patchwork being not that clever counted that for two Acks ... Anyway, just as with the previous patch this one only applied with fuzz probably due to the gpio.h fix. Thanks, Ralf