From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Liu Subject: Re: RFC: change to 6 months release cycle Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:12:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20151006131226.GC29124@zion.uk.xensource.com> References: <20151002174356.GA3577@zion.uk.xensource.com> <5612755302000078000A8114@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <20151005112357.GC29124@zion.uk.xensource.com> <5612629E.8020003@crc.id.au> <5612794E.8090700@crc.id.au> <20151005162225.GK29124@zion.uk.xensource.com> <5613E2C002000078000A88E1@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5613E2C002000078000A88E1@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Steven Haigh , wei.liu2@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 07:03:28AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 05.10.15 at 18:22, wrote: > > FWIW current scheme (last 3 releases as stable releases) means a release > > is supported for at least 27 months (well, let's forget about the > > possibility of releasing a version earlier than expected for now because > > it never happened before). > > Where did you find that? My understanding of the current scheme is > that we generally support branches for 18 months (plus another 18 > security-only), which normally results in a wrap up release on the > oldest maintained branch once its second successor went out. > I was going to say I saw that in http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Maintenance_Releases but it turned out I misremembered. Now you point out this is wrong. Thanks for correcting. So the correct term is: Stable releases are supported fully for 18 months plus another 18 months of security update. I will need to rectify the other email I send. Wei. > Jan