From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Ben Shelton <benjamin.h.shelton@intel.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: IOV: reread SRIOV_NUM_VF after enabling ARI
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 18:13:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151007231317.GH27633@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151007202136.GA19836@bhshelto-vm>
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 03:21:36PM -0500, Ben Shelton wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:29:40PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:55:00PM -0500, Ben Shelton wrote:
> > > For some SR-IOV devices, the number of available virtual functions
> > > increases after enabling ARI. Currently, SRIOV_NUM_VF is read and saved
> > > off before the ARI control bit is enabled. This causes an issue when VFs
> > > are enabled.
> > >
> > > At device init, SRIOV_INITIAL_VF and SRIOV_NUM_VF are specified to contain
> > > the number of available VFs for the device. sriov_enable() does a sanity
> > > check that PCI_SRIOV_INITIAL_VF is not greater than iov->total_VFs, the
> > > saved-off value of SRIOV_NUM_VF. Since the value of both SRIOV_INITIAL_VF
> > > and SRIOV_NUM_VF has increased after enabling the ARI bit, the check fails,
> > > and the VFs cannot be enabled.
> > >
> > > To fix the issue, after ARI is enabled for a device, reread SRIOV_NUM_VF.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Shelton <benjamin.h.shelton@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/iov.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > > index ee0ebff..88b1959 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
> > > @@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static int sriov_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos)
> > > struct pci_sriov *iov;
> > > struct resource *res;
> > > struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > > + bool total_needs_reread = false;
> > >
> > > if (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END &&
> > > pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT)
> > > @@ -409,12 +410,18 @@ static int sriov_init(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos)
> > > goto found;
> > >
> > > pdev = NULL;
> > > - if (pci_ari_enabled(dev->bus))
> > > + if (pci_ari_enabled(dev->bus)) {
> > > ctrl |= PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_ARI;
> > > + total_needs_reread = true;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > found:
> > > pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_CTRL, ctrl);
> > > pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_NUM_VF, 0);
> > > +
> > > + if (total_needs_reread)
> > > + pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF, &total);
> >
> > Can we just *move* the PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF read from its original
> > location and do it unconditionally here? I don't think we use "total"
> > for anything in the interim, and it'd be nice if we could do this
> > without the "total_needs_reread" flag.
>
> The only thing we do with 'total' is return early if it's read as 0
> (i.e. for a device that does not support any VFs). If we just move the
> read to here, a PCI device with no VFs would have its PCI_SRIOV_CTRL
> config word written before PCI_SRIOV_TOTAL_VF is read as 0 and
> sriov_init() returns. The reread preserves the original behavior.
>
> If the change in behavior is OK, I'll make the change and submit a v2.
I think that's OK. We do return some other errors after modifying
PCI_SRIOV_CTRL, so I don't know that this would be any worse.
Bjorn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-07 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-11 21:55 [PATCH] PCI: IOV: reread SRIOV_NUM_VF after enabling ARI Ben Shelton
2015-10-07 19:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-10-07 20:21 ` Ben Shelton
2015-10-07 23:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151007231317.GH27633@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.h.shelton@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.