From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6204202017564393472 X-Received: by 10.50.41.7 with SMTP id b7mr14905619igl.12.1444694047306; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:54:07 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.140.87.36 with SMTP id q33ls75479qgd.62.gmail; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:54:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.13.228.133 with SMTP id n127mr26055740ywe.37.1444694046722; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:54:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id el2si24507pbb.0.2015.10.12.16.54.06 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:54:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gregkh@linuxfoundation.org designates 140.211.169.12 as permitted sender) client-ip=140.211.169.12; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gregkh@linuxfoundation.org designates 140.211.169.12 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Received: from localhost (mobile-166-176-185-12.mycingular.net [166.176.185.12]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63C99360; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 23:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:40:02 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Alison Schofield Cc: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] sending patch revisions w mutt ??? Message-ID: <20151012234002.GB23779@kroah.com> References: <20151011015226.GA3134@Ubuntu-D830> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151011015226.GA3134@Ubuntu-D830> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 06:52:27PM -0700, Alison Schofield wrote: > Looking for help threading my patch revisions in mutt. > > I use the mutt -H option to send the original and now I want to send v2 threaded. > > I can open mutt, goto thread, select reply, and then read (:r) in the patch > file with vim. This also means I edit the Subject line manually. None of this is very elegant. > > Is there a better way? > > Also, do you want it threaded right on top, ie. in reply to the previous > patch message. For a patch series, send a whole new series, it's easier for me to figure out. As for using mutt, it will work, you can just go to the email and do a 'reply all' and hand-edit the header like you are doing, which works well, I do that all the time for "small" patch series. It's whatever you get comfortable with. thanks, greg k-h